What does TVL measure in tokenized private credit?
A dashboard’s total value locked, or TVL, is a starting point for research. Its meaning depends on how the product and data source define it. In a lending product, understanding the relationship between supplied funds and outstanding borrowing changes how you read the headline.
For Figure Markets Democratized Prime, the DefiLlama measure retained in this research covers unmatched lending supply across four pools: Home Equity, Automobile, SMB and Crypto-Backed Loan. This is supply still waiting to be borrowed.[1]
Unmatched supply
Lending supply available to be matched with borrowers. This is the Figure TVL measure used here.
Borrowed value
The amount already lent out. It sits alongside unmatched supply in the lending book.
Total lender supply
Unmatched supply plus borrowed value, calculated on the same source basis.
That question turns a headline percentage into a useful investigation. It is the starting point for this worked example of tokenized private credit research.
Figure’s TVL fell while outstanding loans grew.
Between DefiLlama’s 18 and 25 September 2026 daily labels, unmatched supply fell $6,447,960. Borrowed value increased $4,225,281. Adding the two measures shows that total lender supply fell a much smaller $2,222,679, or 0.2769%.[1]
| Measure | 18 Sep 2026 | 25 Sep 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unmatched supply / TVL | $202,338,859 | $195,890,899 | −$6,447,960 |
| Borrowed value | $600,392,380 | $604,617,661 | +$4,225,281 |
| Total lender supply | $802,731,239 | $800,508,560 | −$2,222,679 |
USD values use DefiLlama’s pricing basis. Total lender supply and changes are Alkaron calculations. The source gives daily date labels without specifying exact measurement instants.
The relationship is balance arithmetic. The full report separately traces recorded lending, withdrawal, borrowing and repayment transactions.
The result is more informative than “TVL fell.” Idle supply declined, outstanding borrowing rose, and the overall lender book contracted modestly. The full private credit report follows the four pools individually to show the activity behind those combined balances.
Why did Figure’s Automobile lending rate increase?
Lending rates also need an explanation. A rate can move because the share of supplied funds being borrowed changes, because the contract’s rate settings change, or because both move together.
In Figure’s Automobile pool, the annualized lending rate increased from 8.0117% to 9.8796% over the pinned weekly endpoints. Alkaron’s calculation separates the effects of the rate parameters and utilization.[2]
18 → 25 September 2026
- Contract parameter effect+2.3091 percentage points
- Utilization effect−0.4412 percentage points
- Net lending-rate change+1.8679 percentage points
The contract recorded a parameter update on 23 September. Its contribution exceeded the total rate increase, while lower utilization offset part of it. This explains the recorded rate mechanics; the evidence does not establish the reason for the parameter decision.
For anyone assessing private credit lending yields, that distinction matters. A higher quoted rate can reflect a change in the rate model even when utilization falls.
Apollo ACRED: higher NAV, unchanged endpoint supply.
Apollo’s ACRED offers a different analytical problem. To understand its token valuation, the report combines supply on all seven issuing networks with the retained RedStone NAV inputs.
At the historical midnight targets for 18 and 25 September, calculated token value rose from $95,484,543.68 to $95,538,803.54. Opening and closing token supplies were equal on each network, so the entire $54,259.86 endpoint increase came from higher NAV per token.[3]
This is a token supply × NAV calculation. Equal endpoint supply establishes no net supply change; it does not describe every transaction between those endpoints. NAV excludes distributions, so the NAV change is distinct from an investor’s total return.
The Figure and ACRED examples answer different questions: how a lending book changed, and how token quantity and NAV affected valuation. Both belong in a careful tokenized private credit analysis, with their measurement bases stated clearly.
What should a private credit RWA weekly report explain?
A useful weekly report connects each reported change to the underlying product. It identifies the measure, reconstructs the comparison, and shows the evidence behind the interpretation.
How is private credit analysis different from watching TVL?
It examines supplied funds, outstanding loans, recorded transactions and lending-rate mechanics together. Figure’s TVL decline becomes more meaningful when you can see the growing borrowed balance and the much smaller change in total lender supply.
Does rising token value mean new money arrived?
That requires evidence about quantity and activity. ACRED’s endpoint value increased with unchanged supply, giving a clear example of a NAV-driven value change.
Where can I get the full private credit research in PDF?
The full Figure & Apollo ACRED private credit research report includes the complete analysis and annotated evidence appendix in HTML and PDF. It expands these findings into pool-level activity, account concentration, rate calculations, collateral disclosures and the seven-network ACRED valuation.
Sources and reporting dates
This article draws from Alkaron Private Credit Research: Figure & Apollo ACRED, 18–25 September 2026, corrected edition 1. It is a public selection of findings from the historical report.
- 1. Figure balances and the TVL definitionDefiLlama: Figure Markets Democratized Prime ↗
Retained daily USD series for the 18 and 25 September labels. The report derives combined supply and changes from those points. The live dashboard may display later observations. - 2. Figure lending-rate mechanicsProvenance blockchain API ↗ and Figure’s pool disclosures ↗
Pinned contract states and recorded updates underpin the rate decomposition. The disclosures provide product context. - 3. ACRED supply and NAVThe report’s retained seven-network supply evidence and RedStone ACRED_FUNDAMENTAL NAV feed. Solana’s historical endpoint supplies were reconstructed from a later reading and intervening transactions returned by the queried node. The full report documents the reconstruction and calculation.
View the historical cutoffs and Figure contract reference
Figure contract endpoints and ACRED historical targets: 18 September 2026, 00:00 UTC → 25 September 2026, 00:00 UTC. Figure blocks: 33,534,870 → 33,674,195. DefiLlama’s daily labels do not establish exact synchronization with those blockchain endpoints.
Automobile parameter update: 23 September 2026, 16:41:38 UTC, block 33,648,257. Pool contract:pb1gqw3m5ftuu0hdcj646ppgmrp7ual3kkjj2wq6usqsfe0ntfmsc7s8fh70c
Report as of: 25 September 2026, 18:25:38.880 UTC. Evidence known by: 28 September 2026, 02:46:21.229 UTC. Corrected edition prepared: 28 September 2026 UTC.
Further reading: RWA Market Pulse: Why Knowing What Actually Changed Matters.